Wheel Hub Recall – National #515089
Read moreTwitter Follower Promo – 5% Discount
Read moreTesting our NEW API connection to Twitter
Read moreWix Filter Adapters – Obsolete Filter Conversion Kits
Read moreAutomotive Task Lights & Accessories
Read moreReplacement Instrument Clusters – Dorman OE Solutions
Read moreDie Cast Engine Models & Christmas Ornaments
Read moreAutoExtra Motor Oil – Now Available
Read moreAutoExtra Oil & Air Filters – Cross Reference Wix to AutoExtra
Read moreUndercover Truck Bed Covers – Holiday Special
Read moreConsumer Reports Cars Blog
Video: Chevrolet Camaro vs Ford Mustang V6 - More and less than the sum of their parts
The V6 versions, which screen out the distractions thrown up by the rumble, torque and oversized tires of the V8 models we tested last summer, actually allow for a purer perspective on the underlying cars. (Read the full 2009 muscle and sporty car test, available to online subscribers.) Taking the Ford first, it's clear the folks in Dearborn continue to improve the Mustang breed. Despite mechanical throwbacks like a live rear axle, it drives like a champ: alert, responsive, agile and ready for action. The shifter is a delight, and the 3.7-liter V6 sounds satisfying and pulls strongly. However, the switch to electric power steering that came with the 2011 model year has blunted some of the feedback it had previously. (Privately, some Ford engineers I've spoken with agree with that judgment.) But the electric steering is still quick, linear, and well-weighted and it contributes to average fuel use of 24 mpg - not too shabby for a 300-hp machine. And if the need for speed trumps your green sentiments, the Mustang GT packs a 412-hp, 5.0-liter V8, which brings a terrific sound and, at $36,000, is a performance bargain.
Now consider the Camaro. It was derived from the rear-drive Pontiac G8, a sedan that's held in universal high esteem by driving enthusiasts because of its sophisticated chassis and impeccable road manners. The Camaro employs the G8's basic hardware, but it fails to excite the driver. The steering response and feel is not fitting with a sporty car. The high belt line makes it tough to see out in any direction, which effectively blinds you to the outside world, let alone the next corner. The 312-hp V6 version feels limp and uninvolving to drive. Throw in tall gear ratios, a balky shifter, and the 275-pound weight disadvantage compared to the Mustang, and you find yourself saying, "This car might as well be an automatic." If you are already yawning, I'm not blaming you.
So while the Camaro may boast a more impressive spec sheet, with state-of-the-art this and that, on the road it amounts to less than the sum of its many precision parts. Conversely, the ostensibly cruder Mustang delivers on a level that surpasses the sum of its parts.
Read our Camaro vs Mustang Face Off, and research the Camaro and Mustang in our model overview pages, where you'll find full performance data, photos, videos, owner cost information, and much more. (See our Dodge Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang video shootout from 2009.)
Now if only I could find my old slot-car set...
—Gabe ShenharAverage gas prices--September 6, 2010
Gasoline prices are down in most areas of the country compared to the week before. The national gasoline average is $.09 above the price this time last year. Diesel fuel is about $.28 above this time last year.
|
National regular gasoline prices |
Price | Change from last week |
|
Regular gasoline/gallon |
$2.68 | 0 |
|
Diesel fuel/gallon |
$2.93 | ↓ .01 |
| Regional regular gasoline prices | ||
|
East Coast |
$2.60 | ↓ .01 |
|
—New England |
$2.66 | ↓ .02 |
|
—Central Atlantic |
$2.62 | ↓ .02 |
|
—Lower Atlantic |
$2.56 | 0 |
|
Midwest |
$2.67 | ↑ .04 |
|
Gulf Coast |
$2.52 | ↓ .01 |
|
Rocky Mountain |
$2.82 | 0 |
|
West Coast |
$3.00 | ↓ .04 |
|
—California |
$3.04 | ↓ .05 |
Source: Energy Information Administration, 9/6/10. Figures rounded to the nearest cent.
For more information on saving fuel see our reports on how to get the best gas mileage and where to find the cheapest gas and more in our guide to fuel economy.
Driving impressions: Hyundai Equus luxury sedan
Last year, when Hyundai moved upscale with its Genesis luxury sedan, the question was: would anyone pay about $38,000 for a South Korean car? The answer was “yes.”
This fall, Hyundai is upping the ante again, with its $50,000+ full-sized Equus ultra-luxury sedan. Whereas the Genesis was designed to compete with cars such as the BMW 5 Series and the Mercedes-Benz E-Class (as well as less expensive competitors such as the Acura TL and RL and Lexus ES and GS), for roughly $15,000 less, the Equus is designed to compete with those companies’ flagship luxury cars, the BMW 7-series, Mercedes-Benz S-class, and Lexus LS. And just as the Genesis significantly undercuts its competitors on price, the Equus will cost tens of thousands of dollars less.
To get an early take on this new sedan, we borrowed a press car from Hyundai that we could put through its paces at our Auto Test Center. Our initial impressions are that the Equus feels very luxurious, with a comfortable ride and a mostly hushed interior. Cabin furnishings are top-notch. The 4.6-liter V8 and six-speed automatic are very impressive. But the Equus isn’t as engaging to drive as its sportier counterparts. In that regard, the Equus’ overall character reminds us more of the Lexus LS 460. And that’s not bad company to keep, considering the LS 460 has the highest overall test score in our current ratings. But the Equus lacks the Lexus’s eerily quiet cabin and ultimate ride comfort.
We’ll have to wait until the Equus goes on sale this fall before we can buy one to put through our full battery of tests. In the meantime, check out the video for our early impressions.
—Eric EvartsUnveiled: 2011 Dodge Durango - What do you think?
It is powered by the new Pentastar 3.6-liter V6 engine, with a 6,200-lb. tow capacity. For more might, a 5.7-liter Hemi V8 will be available with a 7,400-lb. tow capacity—more than enough for a typical 24-foot boat and trailer. Horsepower and fuel economy figures have not been released. However, we can guess the output, as these power plants are shared with the redesigned 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. There, the V6 produces 290 horsepower and the V8 churns out 360 horsepower.
Safety features include standard three-row curtain air bags, active head restraints, and stability control. Available premium equipment includes adaptive cruise control, collision warning, blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-path detection.
The new Durango goes on sale late in 2010. See more 2011 Durango photos.
How do you like the overall package and styling? Post your thoughts in the comments below.
—Jeff BartlettHow will your car rate under new EPA fuel economy window stickers?
According to EPA assistant administrator Gina McCarthy, the letter grades—from "A+" to "D"—will be assigned on a bell curve, with the median being a "B-." That means most cars will cluster around a "B-," while few will get an "A+" or "D." Specifically, according to the joint notice of proposed rulemaking by the EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 697 of the 2012 model-year vehicles will get a "B-," while 14 will get an "A-." There will be a dozen vehicles that get the lowest mark, "D." (The EPA counts each drivetrain variation within a model separately.)
For now, no cars rate an "A" or an "A+." According to the schema, only pure electric cars would be eligible for an "A+," only plug-in hybrids could get an "A," and only conventional hybrids could get an "A-," says McCarthy. (Whether those cars deserve that grade comes down to where the electricity they use comes from, which consumers can find out from the QR Code on the new window sticker.) So far only the Ferrari 612 Scaglietti rates a "D," and only the Ford Fusion Hybrid, Honda Civic Hybrid, and Toyota Prius rate an "A-."
Other interesting examples include the Ford Escape, Nissan Altima, and Toyota Camry hybrids, which each get a "B+," and the Toyota Highlander Hybrid, which gets a "B." The Honda CR-V and four-cylinder Toyota RAV4 each rate a "B+," while other popular small SUVs such as the Subaru Forester and the V6-powered RAV4 only get a "B." Several family sedans such as the Honda Accord and Chevrolet Malibu are rated "B" with in their four-cylinder engine variants, while the V6 versions get a "B-."
Most large half-ton pickups, as well as popular midsized SUVs such as the Honda Pilot and the Jeep Grand Cherokee, are rated "C+."
If approved, the new system may take a little getting used to. But just like in school, a "C" isn't a very good grade, while only the stars will get "A+." To see how your car rates, check out page 37 of the PDF of the agencies' proposed rule.
Learn more about the window stickers under consideration, and share your opinion.
Also read:
New-car fuel-economy stickers promise abundant information and connectivity
Your vote: Should new car fuel economy labels include letter grades?
See our guide to fuel economy for advice on saving gasoline. Learn about future technologies in our guide to alternative fuels.
